1998 Kia Elan vs. 1973 Datsun 240Z

To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 151 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.

Because 1973 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1973 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan. 1973 Datsun 240Z has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Elan has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Datsun 240Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: