1998 Kia Elan vs. 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200.
Because 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200. (164 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 | |
| Make | Kia | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Elan | 200 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2800 mm |
