1998 Kia Elan vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Kia Elan | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Elan | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 157 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2480 mm |