1998 Kia Elan vs. 1980 Reliant GTC
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Reliant GTC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Reliant GTC would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Reliant GTC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1980 Reliant GTC. (135 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1980 Reliant GTC.
Because 1980 Reliant GTC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Reliant GTC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Reliant GTC (206 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1980 Reliant GTC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1980 Reliant GTC | |
| Make | Kia | Reliant |
| Model | Elan | GTC |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 135 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2640 mm |
