1998 Kia Elan vs. 1981 Holden Commodore

To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,837 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1981 Holden Commodore. (102 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Commodore.

Because 1981 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Holden Commodore (192 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1981 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan. 1981 Holden Commodore has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Elan has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Holden Commodore will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: