1998 Kia Elan vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1983 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Elan | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1593 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2530 mm |
