1998 Kia Elan vs. 1992 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Maserati Shamal would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Maserati Shamal (321 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1992 Maserati Shamal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Maserati Shamal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Maserati Shamal (444 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1992 Maserati Shamal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Kia Elan | 1992 Maserati Shamal | |
Make | Kia | Maserati |
Model | Elan | Shamal |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3217 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 321 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 444 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2520 mm |