1998 Kia Elan vs. 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL (231 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL (268 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Kia Elan | 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Kia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Elan | SL |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 231 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 268 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2520 mm |