1998 Kia Elan vs. 1992 Rover 220
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 220 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1992 Rover 220. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 220.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 220. (180 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1992 Rover 220 | |
| Make | Kia | Rover |
| Model | Elan | 220 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2560 mm |
