1998 Kia Elan vs. 1992 Rover 400
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1992 Rover 400. (86 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1992 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Kia | Rover |
| Model | Elan | 400 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 86 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2560 mm |
