1998 Kia Elan vs. 1993 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercury Cougar (202 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1993 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mercury Cougar (359 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1993 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1993 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Kia | Mercury |
| Model | Elan | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 202 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2880 mm |
