1998 Kia Elan vs. 1996 Tata E220
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Tata E220 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Tata E220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1996 Tata E220. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1996 Tata E220.
Because 1996 Tata E220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Tata E220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Tata E220 (210 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1996 Tata E220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Kia Elan | 1996 Tata E220 | |
Make | Kia | Tata |
Model | Elan | E220 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 210 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2810 mm |