1998 Kia Elan vs. 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace.
Because 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace (226 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
| Make | Kia | Toyota |
| Model | Elan | Hi-Ace |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2446 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1960 mm |
