1998 Kia Elan vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (300 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan. 2003 MG ZT has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Elan has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MG ZT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Kia Elan | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Kia | MG |
Model | Elan | ZT |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 300 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2760 mm |