1998 Kia Elan vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (126 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Elan | Colt |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 94 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2550 mm |
