1998 Kia Elan vs. 2007 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2007 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2007 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan. 2007 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Elan has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 2007 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Kia | Toyota |
| Model | Elan | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 4664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 260 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 415 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2800 mm |
