1998 Kia Elan vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Kia Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Elan has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Kia | Mazda |
| Model | Elan | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 270 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2880 mm |
