1998 Kia Elan vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Kia Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Kia Elan | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Kia | Jeep |
Model | Elan | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 205 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 325 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2423 mm |