1998 Kia Elan vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Elan | Colt |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2500 mm |
