1998 Kia Elan vs. 2012 BMW 520

To start off, 2012 BMW 520 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 520 (182 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.

Because 2012 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 520 (270 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2012 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan. 2012 BMW 520 has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Elan has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW 520 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: