1998 Kia Joice vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Joice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Joice would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1998 Kia Joice. (136 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Joice.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Kia Joice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Joice. (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Joice.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Kia Joice | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Kia | Citroen |
Model | Joice | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1977 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.1 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |