1998 Lada Niva vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lada Niva would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1998 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1998 Lada Niva.
Because 1998 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lada Niva. (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Lada Niva | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Lada | Ford |
Model | Niva | E-350 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1689 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 57 L |