1998 Lada Samara II vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1998 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1998 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 159 kg more than 1998 Lada Samara II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lada Samara II. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Lada Samara II | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara II | 6 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2680 mm |