1998 Lada Samara II vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lada Samara II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 15 kg more than 1998 Lada Samara II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lada Samara II (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Lada Samara II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lada Samara II | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lada | Renault |
| Model | Samara II | Clio |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1149 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2480 mm |
