1998 Lada Samara II vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lada Samara II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1998 Lada Samara II. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1998 Lada Samara II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lada Samara II (110 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1998 Lada Samara II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lada Samara II | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Lada | Nissan |
| Model | Samara II | Micra |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2449 mm |
