1998 Lancia Zeta vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1998 Lancia Zeta is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lancia Zeta (145 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Lancia Zeta | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Lancia | Lotus |
Model | Zeta | Seven |
Year Released | 1998 | 1960 |
Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2240 mm |