1998 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1998 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 855 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1998 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Land Rover Range Rover | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Land Rover | Riley |
| Model | Range Rover | RM A |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2870 mm |
