1998 Lexus GS vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lexus GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lexus GS would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Lexus GS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lexus GS (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lexus GS should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Lexus GS weights approximately 642 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Lexus GS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lexus GS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lexus GS (301 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1998 Lexus GS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 1998 Lexus GS has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Lexus GS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Lexus GS | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lexus | Renault |
Model | GS | Clio |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |