1998 Lotus 340 R vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus 340 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus 340 R would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1998 Lotus 340 R. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1998 Lotus 340 R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 1242 kg more than 1998 Lotus 340 R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lotus 340 R. (198 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus 340 R | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | Lotus | Mercury |
| Model | 340 R | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 4013 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1917 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |
