1998 Lotus 340 R vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus 340 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus 340 R would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus 340 R (190 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2009 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus 340 R should accelerate faster than 2009 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 655 kg more than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Because 1998 Lotus 340 R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus 340 R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus 340 R (198 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota Matrix. (174 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus 340 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus 340 R | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Lotus | Toyota |
| Model | 340 R | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |
