1998 Lotus 340 R vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus 340 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus 340 R would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus 340 R (190 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2011 Holden Cruze. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus 340 R should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Cruze.
Because 1998 Lotus 340 R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus 340 R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lotus 340 R. (198 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus 340 R | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Lotus | Holden |
| Model | 340 R | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2685 mm |
