1998 Lotus Emme vs. 1973 Mazda 929
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 929. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda 929 weights approximately 482 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 929. (137 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Lotus Emme | 1973 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Emme | 929 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2174 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 354 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 678 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2520 mm |