1998 Lotus Emme vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 306 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus Emme | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Lotus | Zastava |
| Model | Emme | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 2174 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 678 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2430 mm |
