1998 Lotus Emme vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 382 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Lotus Emme | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Emme | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2174 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 105 HP |
Torque | 354 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 678 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2430 mm |