1998 Lotus Emme vs. 1986 Reliant SE6
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1986 Reliant SE6. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1986 Reliant SE6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Reliant SE6 weights approximately 572 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Reliant SE6. (233 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Reliant SE6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus Emme | 1986 Reliant SE6 | |
| Make | Lotus | Reliant |
| Model | Emme | SE6 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2174 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 133 HP |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 678 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2650 mm |
