1998 Lotus Emme vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 527 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus Emme | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Emme | 626 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2174 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 678 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2620 mm |
