1998 Lotus Emme vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus Emme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus Emme would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2007 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Epica.
Because 1998 Lotus Emme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Emme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus Emme | 2007 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Lotus | Holden |
| Model | Emme | Epica |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2174 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
