1998 Lotus Emme vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus Emme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus Emme would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 152 more horse power than 2009 Volvo V50. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo V50.
Because 1998 Lotus Emme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Emme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo V50. (240 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Lotus Emme | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | Emme | V50 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2174 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 354 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2650 mm |