1998 Lotus Emme vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus Emme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus Emme would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1998 Lotus Emme. (260 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1998 Lotus Emme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 2127 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-250 (494 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lotus Emme. (354 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Lotus Emme | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Lotus | Ford |
Model | Emme | F-250 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2174 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 354 Nm | 494 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 678 kg | 2805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 6253 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3967 mm |