1998 Lotus Emme vs. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus Emme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus Emme would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 192 more horse power than 2012 Lancia Ypsilon. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 2012 Lancia Ypsilon.
Because 1998 Lotus Emme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Emme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus Emme | 2012 Lancia Ypsilon | |
| Make | Lotus | Lancia |
| Model | Emme | Ypsilon |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2174 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 68 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2390 mm |
