1998 Lotus GT 1 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus GT 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus GT 1 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus GT 1 (580 HP) has 236 more horse power than 2010 Holden Calais. (344 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Calais.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lotus GT 1. (391 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lotus GT 1. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1998 Lotus GT 1 has manual transmission. 1998 Lotus GT 1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Lotus GT 1 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Lotus | Holden |
| Model | GT 1 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 580 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 391 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
