1998 Mahindra Armada vs. 1982 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1998 Mahindra Armada is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Camry (106 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1998 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1998 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 900 kg more than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Because 1998 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mahindra Armada | 1982 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Camry |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4420 mm |
