1998 Maserati Shamal vs. 1982 Mini Clubman
To start off, 1998 Maserati Shamal is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Maserati Shamal weights approximately 670 kg more than 1982 Mini Clubman.
Because 1998 Maserati Shamal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Maserati Shamal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Maserati Shamal | 1982 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Maserati | Mini |
Model | Shamal | Clubman |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3217 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2140 mm |