1998 Maserati Shamal vs. 2000 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2000 Toyota Corona is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Maserati Shamal would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Maserati Shamal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Maserati Shamal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Corona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Toyota Corona has automatic transmission and 1998 Maserati Shamal has manual transmission. 1998 Maserati Shamal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Toyota Corona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Maserati Shamal | 2000 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Maserati | Toyota |
| Model | Shamal | Corona |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3217 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
