1998 Mazda 323 vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda 323 (71 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda 323 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda 323 (130 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mazda 323 | 1962 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Mazda | Mini |
| Model | 323 | MK I |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2040 mm |
