1998 Mazda 323 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda 323 (71 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda 323 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda 323 (130 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Mazda 323 1964 Nissan Cedric
Make Mazda Nissan
Model 323 Cedric
Year Released 1998 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1488 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 71 HP 60 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 130 Nm 115 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3200 RPM
Drive Type Front 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1105 kg 1085 kg
Vehicle Length 4400 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2540 mm