1998 Mazda 323 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda 323 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda 323 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda 323 (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda 323 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | 323 | 102 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2160 mm |