1998 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (77 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda 323 weights approximately 99 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Jazz (110 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (109 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda 323 | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 323 | Jazz |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 77 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 110 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 42 L |