1998 Mazda 323 vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (109 Nm). This means 2011 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323. 2011 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1998 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1998 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda 323 | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 323 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |