1998 Mazda 626 vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 Mazda 626 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (125 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 626. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 315 kg more than 1998 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (306 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mazda 626 | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 626 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 125 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 306 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2760 mm |
